- %IMG_DESC_1%
- %IMG_DESC_2%
- %IMG_DESC_3%
- %IMG_DESC_4%
- %IMG_DESC_5%
- %IMG_DESC_6%
- %IMG_DESC_7%
- %IMG_DESC_8%
- %IMG_DESC_9%
- %IMG_DESC_10%
- %IMG_DESC_11%
- %IMG_DESC_12%
- %IMG_DESC_13%
- %IMG_DESC_14%
- %IMG_DESC_15%
- %IMG_DESC_16%
- %IMG_DESC_17%
- %IMG_DESC_18%
- %IMG_DESC_19%
images %IMG_DESC_8% 
wallpaper %IMG_DESC_1%
2011 %IMG_DESC_2%
more...
more...
2010 %IMG_DESC_3%
more...
hair %IMG_DESC_4%
more...
hot %IMG_DESC_5%
more...
house %IMG_DESC_17%
tattoo %IMG_DESC_6%
more...
pictures %IMG_DESC_7%
dresses %IMG_DESC_12%
more...
makeup %IMG_DESC_9%
girlfriend %IMG_DESC_14%
hairstyles %IMG_DESC_11%
Source URL: http://anacostiaque.blogspot.com/2011/07/images-imgdesc8-img-srcimgurl1-alt_384.html
Visit anacostiaque for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection
cityfisher
07-25 09:06 PM
Both in the job advertisements and Form9089, it is said: minimum of master degree or alternate of bachelor degree plus 2 years' experience.
The LC has been approved in the August of last year, I-140 (EB2) has been filed thereafter, still pending.
How do we file a new application for Eb3 since the original LC has been filed in the last EB2 application?
Is there a way to file an amendment of the pending EB2 to EB3? In this case, can we hire a new lawyer?
Some people has got a RFE, but some just got denied directly, so I am worried.
Can I hire a new lawyer to file a new application for Eb3 using the same LC? but we do not have the original LC? I remember I read somewhere that if we file a new application with request of a duplication of LC, then we cannot file I-140 and I-485 concurrently. In my case, I am desperate to catch the deadline of 8/17, because my H1B is going to expire and reach the maximum.
Please help!
1. What was mentioned in the job advertisements - was the alternate Bachelors+2 years mentioned
2. How long as it been since the last advertisement
3. Can they file another I-140 concurrently with I-485 using the recently approved labor
4. I agree with abhijitp you can get a RFE too
My suggestion would be to apply in EB3 even though the job advertisement reads masters or Bachelors with 2 years and use the option 3
I request you guys to consult a good attorney immediately and help your selves and also save time.
Please consult an attorney for your good.
Disclosure: I'm not an attorney
The LC has been approved in the August of last year, I-140 (EB2) has been filed thereafter, still pending.
How do we file a new application for Eb3 since the original LC has been filed in the last EB2 application?
Is there a way to file an amendment of the pending EB2 to EB3? In this case, can we hire a new lawyer?
Some people has got a RFE, but some just got denied directly, so I am worried.
Can I hire a new lawyer to file a new application for Eb3 using the same LC? but we do not have the original LC? I remember I read somewhere that if we file a new application with request of a duplication of LC, then we cannot file I-140 and I-485 concurrently. In my case, I am desperate to catch the deadline of 8/17, because my H1B is going to expire and reach the maximum.
Please help!
1. What was mentioned in the job advertisements - was the alternate Bachelors+2 years mentioned
2. How long as it been since the last advertisement
3. Can they file another I-140 concurrently with I-485 using the recently approved labor
4. I agree with abhijitp you can get a RFE too
My suggestion would be to apply in EB3 even though the job advertisement reads masters or Bachelors with 2 years and use the option 3
I request you guys to consult a good attorney immediately and help your selves and also save time.
Please consult an attorney for your good.
Disclosure: I'm not an attorney
wallpaper %IMG_DESC_1%
dontcareaboutGC
04-06 02:26 PM
Firstly the fact that there are hundreds of thousands of un-used visa's is a clear indicator of poor USCIS efficiency. Even if the recapture visa effort bears fruit and people will get interim benefit it will do nothing to improve the efficiency of processing cases at USCIS which I think is the root cause of this problem. Yes there is also a supply and demand situation but unless USCIS improves the delays and backlogs may not stand a chance.
Abhinaym
05-09 10:54 AM
My friend's wife just got her H1 receipt number and he wanted to know if she can travel out of the country (and return before October) without stamping and if there is any need to change the status on her passport/visa.
Thank you,
(I'm pretty sure this issue must have come up earlier, I'll be grateful if you can please send a link to the post)
Thank you,
(I'm pretty sure this issue must have come up earlier, I'll be grateful if you can please send a link to the post)
2011 %IMG_DESC_2%
pappu
01-17 02:25 AM
Starting next week we will make IV chat accessible to everyone so that it helps every genuine member. We had set up rules in the system to keep out anyone who does not take IV effort seriously and wants to create mischief.
The aim of the chat is to help build an IV community. If you have any ideas to improve the chat, please PM me directly. Do not post it as I may sometimes miss the posts. Thanks
The aim of the chat is to help build an IV community. If you have any ideas to improve the chat, please PM me directly. Do not post it as I may sometimes miss the posts. Thanks
more...
Mr. Brown
09-29 04:28 PM
I saw that. Looks like you are trying to pimp for a lawyer. Learn to stand on your own 2 feet first.
All you have done is made a phone call to a lawmaker office. Before you start a poll go and meet your lawmaker and learn how to talk to lawmakers. That will be a good start.
What made you think that he was associated with a law office? What makes you an authority to ask people to stand on their feet?
Have you talked to your lawmaker(s)? If so enlighten us with the "learn how to talk to lawmakers" part of your crappy post.
I hope not all "senior" members share your optimistic attitude.
All you have done is made a phone call to a lawmaker office. Before you start a poll go and meet your lawmaker and learn how to talk to lawmakers. That will be a good start.
What made you think that he was associated with a law office? What makes you an authority to ask people to stand on their feet?
Have you talked to your lawmaker(s)? If so enlighten us with the "learn how to talk to lawmakers" part of your crappy post.
I hope not all "senior" members share your optimistic attitude.
gr_b
04-20 03:48 PM
have u got any updates?
I've sent my friend in Houston to passport office to check the status and they found my passport.. they said the same reason (photos are not good)..My friend told them to keep the passport there and he will bring new photos. I've sent the new photos to my friend on friday..I hope these new pics will come good otherwise I'll ask him to bring my passport back.. I need to renew my license :)
I've sent my friend in Houston to passport office to check the status and they found my passport.. they said the same reason (photos are not good)..My friend told them to keep the passport there and he will bring new photos. I've sent the new photos to my friend on friday..I hope these new pics will come good otherwise I'll ask him to bring my passport back.. I need to renew my license :)
more...
Prashant
01-17 07:18 PM
$50.00/month recurring
Total so far $275
Total so far $275
2010 %IMG_DESC_3%
trueguy
09-24 01:00 PM
CIR !!!! --> Not until 2011 at least based on the current political climate, etc IMO.
For EB3 (All countries) to see some light, the changes made recently to the allocation of excess visa, spill over and also to over subscribed countries need to be revisited. Not sure, what triggered USCIS / DOS to revise the interpretation after so many years. Did IV had any role on this, or not .. do not know.. I ask this as based on all forum updates, IV appears to have little success in the Admin Fix area. I have posted this so many times in various threads and did not get an answer, may be there is none. If the interpretation was somewhat like before, EB2 /3 both would have got the spillover... and all would have benefited in the order of PD. Now with the new interpretation. all excess / spillover visa just goes only to 2 countries (EB2 India / China). Looking at the latest numbers based on USCIS website, China has far less cases compared in India based on the cut-off date, which is good for India (EB2), as they now consume a big chunk of the numbers and rest are left out for now. I am not sure, what is opinion on this from folks from ROW (EB3) on this. Does IV has any comment on this... Having said this, I have nothing against Eb2 or EB2 India specific, and not getting into the argument whether or not EB2 need to given much preference.. (Well DOS allocated on 28.6% of total numbers to both this category). This is just my concern on the changes to interpretation for the visa spill over process.
I agree with you completely. No rules were changed anywhere but DOS/USCIS changed the interpretation of spillover. Who approved this changed on whose authority?
In worst case, they should be giving equal share of spillover to both categories purely based on PD. So if 40K numbers are spilling over from EB1 and EB2-ROW then EB2-I/C should get 20K and EB3-ALL should get 20K.
For EB3 (All countries) to see some light, the changes made recently to the allocation of excess visa, spill over and also to over subscribed countries need to be revisited. Not sure, what triggered USCIS / DOS to revise the interpretation after so many years. Did IV had any role on this, or not .. do not know.. I ask this as based on all forum updates, IV appears to have little success in the Admin Fix area. I have posted this so many times in various threads and did not get an answer, may be there is none. If the interpretation was somewhat like before, EB2 /3 both would have got the spillover... and all would have benefited in the order of PD. Now with the new interpretation. all excess / spillover visa just goes only to 2 countries (EB2 India / China). Looking at the latest numbers based on USCIS website, China has far less cases compared in India based on the cut-off date, which is good for India (EB2), as they now consume a big chunk of the numbers and rest are left out for now. I am not sure, what is opinion on this from folks from ROW (EB3) on this. Does IV has any comment on this... Having said this, I have nothing against Eb2 or EB2 India specific, and not getting into the argument whether or not EB2 need to given much preference.. (Well DOS allocated on 28.6% of total numbers to both this category). This is just my concern on the changes to interpretation for the visa spill over process.
I agree with you completely. No rules were changed anywhere but DOS/USCIS changed the interpretation of spillover. Who approved this changed on whose authority?
In worst case, they should be giving equal share of spillover to both categories purely based on PD. So if 40K numbers are spilling over from EB1 and EB2-ROW then EB2-I/C should get 20K and EB3-ALL should get 20K.
more...
istrategist
05-03 02:56 PM
So on 4/23 they sent it back to TSC, and today, May 3, I got an update saying that it is now transferred to a USCIS office.
Any ideas why?
my EAD app was delivered to tx on 3/29, and I got a text on 4/6 saying it was accepted and routed to VSC. A few days later, I got the notice in the mail.
Any ideas why?
my EAD app was delivered to tx on 3/29, and I got a text on 4/6 saying it was accepted and routed to VSC. A few days later, I got the notice in the mail.
hair %IMG_DESC_4%
actaccord
03-13 09:17 AM
/\/\/\/\/\/\
more...
franklin
09-21 03:08 PM
Hey Need Help
I hope your query is answered!Thanks for the pics!!!!
Wow - you are quick! I was just about to dig through my bag to find my MC notes (yes, for some reason they are still in my bag!)
I hope your query is answered!Thanks for the pics!!!!
Wow - you are quick! I was just about to dig through my bag to find my MC notes (yes, for some reason they are still in my bag!)
hot %IMG_DESC_5%
acecupid
07-11 05:57 PM
I'm just curious to know why Zoe Lofgen's website does not show this letter in press releases like her previous letters. The letter is awesome and has all aspects of a legal notice. Looks like she is going to sue USCIS herself on our behalf! :D
We need more people like Zoe who understand the situation better.
We need more people like Zoe who understand the situation better.
more...
house %IMG_DESC_17%
amitjoey
12-18 02:16 PM
Awesome, 7606 members. Need 1396 members in the next 12 days. means more than 100 members a day. Come-on guys. out of the 7606 members we need only 100 or so members to add one more member. That is a joke, we can do better.
tattoo %IMG_DESC_6%
H1BLegal95
06-13 11:08 PM
message from IV
Despite the offensive posts and badmouthing on IV site and other sites we are keeping everyone in mind when working on our lobbying effort. We had posted messages in the past about this too. IV does not advice any flower campaign etc without consulting with us. Any wrong move can potentially hurt the interest of this community and the advocacy work we are doing. Please stop posting offensive messages and stop fighting with other members of the community.
=======================
Message from IV for BEC victims
We are aware of the issue and if there is any acion item, we will post it.
also be aware of what we posted earlier on this issue:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=6084
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?p=100024#post100024
=========================
=========================
Years we have been told priority date establishes your place in the queue.
We have spurned job offers and declined the new PERM process to hold on to the priority dates.
Many are still awaiting labor certifications from the backlog elimination centers. Out comes USCIS and says everyone with a LC can file I140 & I485.
People still waiting for LC with priority dates in 2003-2004 are seeing applicants who have priority dates as late as 2007 but with approved LCs through PERM walk through to I485.
Net result, USCIS is going to be flooded with applicants enough to retrogress the priority dates 3-4 years back as early as september. (Everybody with a LC will be able to file for I485 in July). So applicants with priority dates of 2007 are going to get EAD and GC, while LC backlogged 2003 applicants to have to wait for another 3-4 years before they can even file I485.
Aint fair. Aint fair at all. How can this be. How can rules be changed in the middle of the game.
Despite the offensive posts and badmouthing on IV site and other sites we are keeping everyone in mind when working on our lobbying effort. We had posted messages in the past about this too. IV does not advice any flower campaign etc without consulting with us. Any wrong move can potentially hurt the interest of this community and the advocacy work we are doing. Please stop posting offensive messages and stop fighting with other members of the community.
=======================
Message from IV for BEC victims
We are aware of the issue and if there is any acion item, we will post it.
also be aware of what we posted earlier on this issue:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=6084
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?p=100024#post100024
=========================
=========================
Years we have been told priority date establishes your place in the queue.
We have spurned job offers and declined the new PERM process to hold on to the priority dates.
Many are still awaiting labor certifications from the backlog elimination centers. Out comes USCIS and says everyone with a LC can file I140 & I485.
People still waiting for LC with priority dates in 2003-2004 are seeing applicants who have priority dates as late as 2007 but with approved LCs through PERM walk through to I485.
Net result, USCIS is going to be flooded with applicants enough to retrogress the priority dates 3-4 years back as early as september. (Everybody with a LC will be able to file for I485 in July). So applicants with priority dates of 2007 are going to get EAD and GC, while LC backlogged 2003 applicants to have to wait for another 3-4 years before they can even file I485.
Aint fair. Aint fair at all. How can this be. How can rules be changed in the middle of the game.
more...
pictures %IMG_DESC_7%
sravani
05-16 03:24 PM
I have the birth certificate from my 10th grade. The one we got after the 10th grade board exams. Is that ok. I don't have any other cz I was born at home :o
Will that work?
I don't think your 10th grade certificate will work. The birth certificate should be given by the Muncipality and it should indicate the date your birth was registered, your name, DOB, Father and mother name.
If you don't have this kind of certificate, you need to submit a non availability certificate with two affidavits.
Will that work?
I don't think your 10th grade certificate will work. The birth certificate should be given by the Muncipality and it should indicate the date your birth was registered, your name, DOB, Father and mother name.
If you don't have this kind of certificate, you need to submit a non availability certificate with two affidavits.
dresses %IMG_DESC_12%
nashim
08-06 10:00 AM
EAD efiled on May 19th, 08
FP on June 11th, 08
Two CPO date (on Jul 16th and Jul 30th, 08)
EAD (2-year) received (me+spouse) on Aug 04th, 08
FP on June 11th, 08
Two CPO date (on Jul 16th and Jul 30th, 08)
EAD (2-year) received (me+spouse) on Aug 04th, 08
more...
makeup %IMG_DESC_9%
amitjoey
01-03 04:53 PM
We are 7982 members. Need only 18 members to be 8000 strong.
Good job guys!! Proud of you!!
Good job guys!! Proud of you!!
girlfriend %IMG_DESC_14%
vlad0002
05-16 02:37 PM
Thanks, Sravani.
I guess, the question now is weather INS will put application on hold and request an Xray after her giving birth or just let it go completely...
We'll see.
I guess, the question now is weather INS will put application on hold and request an Xray after her giving birth or just let it go completely...
We'll see.
hairstyles %IMG_DESC_11%
kumar1
05-16 03:26 PM
Same here..They gave me the voice mail but before that they knew about this effort.
MeraNaamJoker
08-03 03:41 PM
Priority Date :- December 26th, 2001.. you should be camping outside the USCIS Service Center doesn't matter what category you are..
On serious note, you should call your senator's office right away before you waste anymore time..
With the senator's office, I have a very bad experience though.:confused:
I called them once in the past (my date was current then) and they returned the call saying that the administration has certain policies on immigration and there is nothing much they can do at the given point of time.
Hence i refrained from it. Does it really help? They might have already forgotten my name by now.
On serious note, you should call your senator's office right away before you waste anymore time..
With the senator's office, I have a very bad experience though.:confused:
I called them once in the past (my date was current then) and they returned the call saying that the administration has certain policies on immigration and there is nothing much they can do at the given point of time.
Hence i refrained from it. Does it really help? They might have already forgotten my name by now.
indian111
05-04 03:13 PM
E-filed EAD on 24th April.
Supporting documents received on Apr 28th.
Received EAD receipt on April 30.
Last year I remember receing the receipt and biometric appt letter together.
Has anyone who efiled for EAD renewal this year have received biometrics appointment?
Please let me know.
Thanks,
indian111
Supporting documents received on Apr 28th.
Received EAD receipt on April 30.
Last year I remember receing the receipt and biometric appt letter together.
Has anyone who efiled for EAD renewal this year have received biometrics appointment?
Please let me know.
Thanks,
indian111
Source URL: http://anacostiaque.blogspot.com/2011/07/images-imgdesc8-img-srcimgurl1-alt_384.html
Visit anacostiaque for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection
.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment