- In the Antwerp Central Train
- Step inside Antwerp#39;s quot;Railway
- Antwerpen-Centraal Railway
- DANCE TRAIN STATION BELGIUM
- Front side of Antwerpen Centraal railway station
- Railway station clock at
- central train station.
- In the Antwerp Central Train
- Antwerp Central Station
- Antwerpen-Centraal railway
- Antwerp#39;s Centraal station
- Antwerp Central Station.
- Bahnhof Antwerpen-Centraal .
- Flash Mob invades Antwerp rail
- Centraal train station in
- Gent Central Train Station
- (Antwerp Central Station)
- CENTRAL STATION ANTWERP
- Central Train Station : the
images In the Antwerp Central Train
wallpaper In the Antwerp Central Train
2011 Step inside Antwerp#39;s quot;Railway
more...
more...
2010 Antwerpen-Centraal Railway
more...
hair DANCE TRAIN STATION BELGIUM
more...
hot Front side of Antwerpen Centraal railway station
more...
house (Antwerp Central Station)
tattoo Railway station clock at
more...
pictures central train station.
dresses Antwerp Central Station.
more...
makeup Antwerp Central Station
girlfriend Flash Mob invades Antwerp rail
hairstyles Antwerp#39;s Centraal station
Source URL: https://anacostiaque.blogspot.com/2011/07/antwerpen-centraal-railway-station.html
Visit anacostiaque for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection
chanukya
02-01 09:37 PM
This is what is there in 187, no mention of page s1105
Only mention page s1121, s1044-1045.
I am still wondering to which amendment S1105 attached
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d110:87:./temp/~bdVZ5O::
S.AMDT.187
Amends: H.R.2 , S.AMDT.112
Sponsor: Sen Kerry, John F. [MA] (submitted 1/24/2007) (proposed 1/24/2007)
AMENDMENT PURPOSE:
In the nature of a substitute.
TEXT OF AMENDMENT AS SUBMITTED: CR S1121
STATUS:
1/24/2007:
Amendment SA 187 proposed by Senator Kennedy for Senator Kerry to Amendment SA 112. (consideration: CR S1044-1045; text: CR S1044)
1/24/2007:
Amendment SA 187 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
s1105 refers to a page. This corresponds to SA 187 ( and I request you to see BACKLOG REDUCTION is there).
Only mention page s1121, s1044-1045.
I am still wondering to which amendment S1105 attached
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d110:87:./temp/~bdVZ5O::
S.AMDT.187
Amends: H.R.2 , S.AMDT.112
Sponsor: Sen Kerry, John F. [MA] (submitted 1/24/2007) (proposed 1/24/2007)
AMENDMENT PURPOSE:
In the nature of a substitute.
TEXT OF AMENDMENT AS SUBMITTED: CR S1121
STATUS:
1/24/2007:
Amendment SA 187 proposed by Senator Kennedy for Senator Kerry to Amendment SA 112. (consideration: CR S1044-1045; text: CR S1044)
1/24/2007:
Amendment SA 187 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
s1105 refers to a page. This corresponds to SA 187 ( and I request you to see BACKLOG REDUCTION is there).
wallpaper In the Antwerp Central Train
psam
05-19 10:23 AM
Called all of them early morning 10am eastern time
which is 7am pacific for me. No hold anywhere. All calls were
done in ten minutes.
Response from most of them was "I will pass the message".
Some took my phone number, name and current location.
Exceptions were
From office of 'Hilda Solis', staff said that congressman is already
supporting those bills.
Office of "Ciro Rodriguez" said that they respond to issues from
their constituents and encouraged me to call my representative.
Office of "Lucille Roybal-Allard" said "pass and message" and asked
if I have contacted my representative.
which is 7am pacific for me. No hold anywhere. All calls were
done in ten minutes.
Response from most of them was "I will pass the message".
Some took my phone number, name and current location.
Exceptions were
From office of 'Hilda Solis', staff said that congressman is already
supporting those bills.
Office of "Ciro Rodriguez" said that they respond to issues from
their constituents and encouraged me to call my representative.
Office of "Lucille Roybal-Allard" said "pass and message" and asked
if I have contacted my representative.
vbkris77
03-20 10:23 AM
Hello, Thanks for the help. Here is my list.
1. As CIS told Congress in a hearing last year, They indeed wasted visas due to administrative delays. Clearing such a backlog would make all EB current. - Best case scenario
2. Allowing people to file Adjustment of Status (AOS) after their immigration petition (I140) is approved but were unable due to their country cap. Relax/clarify the AC-21 rule for Same or Similar occupation. How much long wait is considered long enough to move-on? (in general terms) - Average Scenario
3. Let CIS publish the real backlog of the EB AOS applications (Backlog defined by common sense - should include all the EB AOS cases and not just what they think not backedup due to Visa availability) pending by country, and PD in 2-3 months. - Worst case Scenario. Atleast helps us plan our future by deciding to continue the wait or get back home.
4. Starting the Citizenship clock after I140 approved.
Thanks again for your help..
1. As CIS told Congress in a hearing last year, They indeed wasted visas due to administrative delays. Clearing such a backlog would make all EB current. - Best case scenario
2. Allowing people to file Adjustment of Status (AOS) after their immigration petition (I140) is approved but were unable due to their country cap. Relax/clarify the AC-21 rule for Same or Similar occupation. How much long wait is considered long enough to move-on? (in general terms) - Average Scenario
3. Let CIS publish the real backlog of the EB AOS applications (Backlog defined by common sense - should include all the EB AOS cases and not just what they think not backedup due to Visa availability) pending by country, and PD in 2-3 months. - Worst case Scenario. Atleast helps us plan our future by deciding to continue the wait or get back home.
4. Starting the Citizenship clock after I140 approved.
Thanks again for your help..
2011 Step inside Antwerp#39;s quot;Railway
riva2005
04-06 08:33 PM
What's going on here is that approx there are 500,000 people on H1B visas in this country.
If Anti-H1 crowd propose a bill to throw all of them out, people will laugh at them and ask them to get lost.
So what the anti-H1 crowd has done here is "Slow bleed" as described by admin. Get rid of 8000-10,000 H1Bs out of the country each month. That way, the impact will slow and it wont send any shockwaves. IF existing H1s go to renew their H1 and the new rules apply, half of them wont fit in the new rules of "You cannot do consulting". So they will have to go back.
These guys are trying to do what UK did to Indian and Chinese doctors. They want all of us to go back. Only difference between what UK did to doctors and what these guys want to do to us is that these guys are smarter and they are trying to get this done in slow motion. IF they take Tancredo like approach of "Everyone out, and shut the door", then it wont work.
They have learned from Tancredo's mistake and now have adoped this slow bleed strategy of getting rid of their competition.
If desi bodyshops are punished this way, then all of us will also be punished. This is not the right way to stop abuse. The right way to stop abuse is to allow more portability between jobs and retention of PDs, etc.
By making consulting totally illegal, they are going too far and the fallout will be felt by H1B employees also.
Basically, they want the 1990s back. They want to roam in job market with foriegn competition, where even high-school drop-outs can get jobs of $100,000 a year by writing 20 lines of code per week.
Man up you xenophobes. Face the competition and stop being whiny boys running to Grassley and Sessions every time you lose jobs. Get a job and get a life. Unemployment rate is 4.4 %. If you cant find jobs right now, dont blame H1B employees. Something is wrong with you.
If Anti-H1 crowd propose a bill to throw all of them out, people will laugh at them and ask them to get lost.
So what the anti-H1 crowd has done here is "Slow bleed" as described by admin. Get rid of 8000-10,000 H1Bs out of the country each month. That way, the impact will slow and it wont send any shockwaves. IF existing H1s go to renew their H1 and the new rules apply, half of them wont fit in the new rules of "You cannot do consulting". So they will have to go back.
These guys are trying to do what UK did to Indian and Chinese doctors. They want all of us to go back. Only difference between what UK did to doctors and what these guys want to do to us is that these guys are smarter and they are trying to get this done in slow motion. IF they take Tancredo like approach of "Everyone out, and shut the door", then it wont work.
They have learned from Tancredo's mistake and now have adoped this slow bleed strategy of getting rid of their competition.
If desi bodyshops are punished this way, then all of us will also be punished. This is not the right way to stop abuse. The right way to stop abuse is to allow more portability between jobs and retention of PDs, etc.
By making consulting totally illegal, they are going too far and the fallout will be felt by H1B employees also.
Basically, they want the 1990s back. They want to roam in job market with foriegn competition, where even high-school drop-outs can get jobs of $100,000 a year by writing 20 lines of code per week.
Man up you xenophobes. Face the competition and stop being whiny boys running to Grassley and Sessions every time you lose jobs. Get a job and get a life. Unemployment rate is 4.4 %. If you cant find jobs right now, dont blame H1B employees. Something is wrong with you.
more...
tejonidhi
08-05 12:43 AM
Folks, I am happy to inform you all that I received CPO email at 12: 17 AM today. MY wife also received approval along with me .
************************************************** ************************************************** **********
On August 4, 2010, we ordered production of your new card. Please allow 30 days for your card to be mailed to you. If we need something from you we will contact you. If you move before you receive the card, call customer service at 1-800-375-5283.
************************************************** ************************************************** ************
Mine is from NSC .
Steps I followed so far.
On July 29 contacted the congressman and initiated inquiry. I gave him the final documentation on Aug 2nd , 2010
On Aug 2nd emailed NSC with my I485 receipt notice and asked them to approve us as ( email address NCSCFollowup.Nsc@dhs.gov)
************************************************** ************************************************** **************
Dear Sir / Madam,
My name is XXXXXXXXXXXXX I have a I-485 application (adjustment of Status) pending at Nebraska Service Center. I have applied for my I-485(Employment based) in July 2007 and I received confirmation from Nebraska Service Center that it is accepted with a notice date of XX/XX/XX. My Category is EB2 and I am from India. As per the latest visa bulletin ( August 2010) USCIS is currently processing cases with priority dates in 2006, my priority date is XX/XX/XXXX but I still have not heard any decision on my pending 485 case.
Please kindly have a look at the receipts and adjudicate my case accordingly.
Here are my details
Name : XXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXXX
I-485 Receipt Number : LINXXXXXXXXX
I-140 Receipt Number : LINXXXXXXXXX
Alien Number: AXXXXXXX
Your Kind attention is greatly appreciated.
Regards
XXXXXXXXXXXX , XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
************************************************** ************************************************** **************
On Aug 3rd contacted the customer service rep and opened a SR for my wife's application.
On Aug 4th took info pass and asked him to take appropriate action.
On Aug 4th 8:00 Spoke with a 2nd level IO about my application. she said she will email the person working on my case.
************************************************** ************************************************** **********
On August 4, 2010, we ordered production of your new card. Please allow 30 days for your card to be mailed to you. If we need something from you we will contact you. If you move before you receive the card, call customer service at 1-800-375-5283.
************************************************** ************************************************** ************
Mine is from NSC .
Steps I followed so far.
On July 29 contacted the congressman and initiated inquiry. I gave him the final documentation on Aug 2nd , 2010
On Aug 2nd emailed NSC with my I485 receipt notice and asked them to approve us as ( email address NCSCFollowup.Nsc@dhs.gov)
************************************************** ************************************************** **************
Dear Sir / Madam,
My name is XXXXXXXXXXXXX I have a I-485 application (adjustment of Status) pending at Nebraska Service Center. I have applied for my I-485(Employment based) in July 2007 and I received confirmation from Nebraska Service Center that it is accepted with a notice date of XX/XX/XX. My Category is EB2 and I am from India. As per the latest visa bulletin ( August 2010) USCIS is currently processing cases with priority dates in 2006, my priority date is XX/XX/XXXX but I still have not heard any decision on my pending 485 case.
Please kindly have a look at the receipts and adjudicate my case accordingly.
Here are my details
Name : XXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXXX
I-485 Receipt Number : LINXXXXXXXXX
I-140 Receipt Number : LINXXXXXXXXX
Alien Number: AXXXXXXX
Your Kind attention is greatly appreciated.
Regards
XXXXXXXXXXXX , XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
************************************************** ************************************************** **************
On Aug 3rd contacted the customer service rep and opened a SR for my wife's application.
On Aug 4th took info pass and asked him to take appropriate action.
On Aug 4th 8:00 Spoke with a 2nd level IO about my application. she said she will email the person working on my case.
roseball
04-19 01:05 PM
Yes, since H4 is tagged to your H1, you should receive your H1 approval too...Yes, you will be receiving a I-94 too along with the approval notice..The I-94 should be attached in bottom right corner on your approval notice. If you dont see an attached I-94 to your I-797 approval notice, then you will have to leave the country before your current I-94 expires and re-enter by getting a visa stamped..
more...
learning01
02-01 08:46 PM
by congressional staff. Because the CR (Congressional Record) of SA 187 and SA 180 refer to the same CR .
Or
it is possible that SA 180 is merged with 187, as I read ( I can post) the Senate discussion verbatim and Senator Kennedy introduced SA187. And the CR record has these confusing.
S.AMDT.187 to H.R.2 , by Kerry Refers to CR S1121--Passed (does not contain backlog or immigration provisions)
S.AMDT.180 to H.R.2 , by Kennedy Refers to CR S1088-1104 --Not Passed/not voted--(S1088-1104---consists of Backlog reduction provisions).
We missed it guys......very narrowly.
Or
it is possible that SA 180 is merged with 187, as I read ( I can post) the Senate discussion verbatim and Senator Kennedy introduced SA187. And the CR record has these confusing.
S.AMDT.187 to H.R.2 , by Kerry Refers to CR S1121--Passed (does not contain backlog or immigration provisions)
S.AMDT.180 to H.R.2 , by Kennedy Refers to CR S1088-1104 --Not Passed/not voted--(S1088-1104---consists of Backlog reduction provisions).
We missed it guys......very narrowly.
2010 Antwerpen-Centraal Railway
Houstonguy
05-05 04:22 PM
PD is May 15, 2006. Still waiting...Can any one suggest what is the best way to expedite it..
more...
ps57002
05-16 07:26 PM
I left messages for all... I will try calling again during office hours on Monday to get a live person...
hair DANCE TRAIN STATION BELGIUM
rolrblade
07-19 02:07 PM
Hi All,
MY LC (PD May 2003) is still stuck in DBEC. So I may or may not be able to file withing Aug17th.
My question is regarding the procedure used by USCIS to process AOS applications. It would be great if someone could explain this to me.
These are my questions:
1. Is the AOS application processed by RD or PD?
2. Once USCIS starts processing the I485, do they check PD at any stage, or is it just used as the initail "gate " for allowing I485 application submission?
3. Suppose Tom with a PD of July 2006 applied in July 2007. Then Harry's case gets approved by BEC in August 2007 and he applies in October 2007. Who will get the GC first?
Thanks for the help!
Houston:
let me try to answer your question the best I can. Answers in order:
For all purposes: lets assume 2 examples. Person A PD July 2006 and RD of July2, 2007 and Person B PD April 2006 and RD of July 2, 2007.
1. AOS is processed by a "combination" of RD and PD. As per the current Bulletin BOTH A and B can apply. The Service centres are currently processing September 2006 applications. When they reach July 2, 2007 processing dates, both applications will be picked up and then "thoeretically" they should ask for Visa number for A BEFORE asking a visa number for B as A has an earlier PD.
2. Answered in same question 1 above.
3. If Harry's case gets approved in August 2007 by BEC he WILL NOT be able to apply for I-485 as the July Bulleting is valid only for applicants VALID in july. Just beacuse they are accepting till AUg 17, does not mean people whose LC got approved between Aug 1-17 can apply, becuase they were technically NOT eligible to apply in July.
Does that answer your questions. PM me if you want more detail.
MY LC (PD May 2003) is still stuck in DBEC. So I may or may not be able to file withing Aug17th.
My question is regarding the procedure used by USCIS to process AOS applications. It would be great if someone could explain this to me.
These are my questions:
1. Is the AOS application processed by RD or PD?
2. Once USCIS starts processing the I485, do they check PD at any stage, or is it just used as the initail "gate " for allowing I485 application submission?
3. Suppose Tom with a PD of July 2006 applied in July 2007. Then Harry's case gets approved by BEC in August 2007 and he applies in October 2007. Who will get the GC first?
Thanks for the help!
Houston:
let me try to answer your question the best I can. Answers in order:
For all purposes: lets assume 2 examples. Person A PD July 2006 and RD of July2, 2007 and Person B PD April 2006 and RD of July 2, 2007.
1. AOS is processed by a "combination" of RD and PD. As per the current Bulletin BOTH A and B can apply. The Service centres are currently processing September 2006 applications. When they reach July 2, 2007 processing dates, both applications will be picked up and then "thoeretically" they should ask for Visa number for A BEFORE asking a visa number for B as A has an earlier PD.
2. Answered in same question 1 above.
3. If Harry's case gets approved in August 2007 by BEC he WILL NOT be able to apply for I-485 as the July Bulleting is valid only for applicants VALID in july. Just beacuse they are accepting till AUg 17, does not mean people whose LC got approved between Aug 1-17 can apply, becuase they were technically NOT eligible to apply in July.
Does that answer your questions. PM me if you want more detail.
more...
suriajay12
03-20 07:20 AM
1. Remove Quotas.
2. Make all categories current immediately for India.
3. Anyone 5 years with W2s: Greencard.
4. ,, 10 years ,, : Citizenship.
5. Once current backlogs cleared, remove all EB Categories and create a point based system, independent of employer with a processing time of 2-3 years.
2. Make all categories current immediately for India.
3. Anyone 5 years with W2s: Greencard.
4. ,, 10 years ,, : Citizenship.
5. Once current backlogs cleared, remove all EB Categories and create a point based system, independent of employer with a processing time of 2-3 years.
hot Front side of Antwerpen Centraal railway station
PlainSpeak
01-12 09:26 PM
Thanks for your response.
If you have an argument with some members on the forum, I think it should be restricted to just that. Calling every EB2 applicant a bigot is rude and uncalled for.
My colleague who recommended me to this forum is an EB2 applicant and is supportive of complete EB backlog elimination and is active in the IV state chapter inspite of getting his green card last year. Even the EB2 applicants on this particular thread have largely tried to point to how we should focus on the larger issue instead of fighting among ourselves. If you do not believe in IV, thats your choice - but I think we need this platform to achieve any relief for EB3.
I look forward to working on IV action items and lawmaker meetings. lets get this issue resolved for every EB applicant
If you have an argument with some members on the forum, I think it should be restricted to just that. Calling every EB2 applicant a bigot is rude and uncalled for.
You know now that is the kind of argument i cannot argue against. I am extreamly sorry for the the bigot name calling against EB2 but only sorry to the folks like your colleague who recommended you to this forum and who are active in the IV state chapter inspite of getting his green card because he/she is a person worth admiration and emulation
Even the EB2 applicants on this particular thread have largely tried to point to how we should focus on the larger issue instead of fighting among ourselves
Now coming to the larger issue what i do not understand is the blind faith of everyone that Eb2 will become current. That will never happen so the assumption that EB3 will get spillover visa after EB2 gets current will never happen, and with that in mind all these statements that this plan will work for everyone bound for failure
If you do not believe in IV, thats your choice - but I think we need this platform to achieve any relief for EB3.
If i did not believe that IV was one a platform to achieve relief for EB i would not be sitting at 10:45 pm typing this message. But please notice that i said EB not EB3 because i feel the current approach of IV will be determinable to EB3 on the whole
If you have an argument with some members on the forum, I think it should be restricted to just that. Calling every EB2 applicant a bigot is rude and uncalled for.
My colleague who recommended me to this forum is an EB2 applicant and is supportive of complete EB backlog elimination and is active in the IV state chapter inspite of getting his green card last year. Even the EB2 applicants on this particular thread have largely tried to point to how we should focus on the larger issue instead of fighting among ourselves. If you do not believe in IV, thats your choice - but I think we need this platform to achieve any relief for EB3.
I look forward to working on IV action items and lawmaker meetings. lets get this issue resolved for every EB applicant
If you have an argument with some members on the forum, I think it should be restricted to just that. Calling every EB2 applicant a bigot is rude and uncalled for.
You know now that is the kind of argument i cannot argue against. I am extreamly sorry for the the bigot name calling against EB2 but only sorry to the folks like your colleague who recommended you to this forum and who are active in the IV state chapter inspite of getting his green card because he/she is a person worth admiration and emulation
Even the EB2 applicants on this particular thread have largely tried to point to how we should focus on the larger issue instead of fighting among ourselves
Now coming to the larger issue what i do not understand is the blind faith of everyone that Eb2 will become current. That will never happen so the assumption that EB3 will get spillover visa after EB2 gets current will never happen, and with that in mind all these statements that this plan will work for everyone bound for failure
If you do not believe in IV, thats your choice - but I think we need this platform to achieve any relief for EB3.
If i did not believe that IV was one a platform to achieve relief for EB i would not be sitting at 10:45 pm typing this message. But please notice that i said EB not EB3 because i feel the current approach of IV will be determinable to EB3 on the whole
more...
house (Antwerp Central Station)
BharatPremi
10-12 02:46 PM
"Year 2003 - EB2 faced little retrogression briefly for 4-5 months and
second trend of RIR denials and second trend of forcing EB3- NON RIR
filing. EB3 faced brief retrogression for 2 months. "
Bharat Premi please clarify
It is difficult for me to produce all "Proofs" at this point of time, perhaps if I dig my some of past CDs I may be able to bring some articles but it will be a hell of time. Anyway still trying to put some explanation. First of all you need to understand the difference between today's bulletin system and bulletin system prevalent around 1999-2003. I vaguely remember, mostly till 2002 mid only Mexico and Philipines and India were "oversubscribed" countries.INS played a very smart game with bulletins then as well but somehow there was no public cry like what we experienced during this july. I do not remember exactly but probably during almost whole 2003 and perhaps for some months during 2002 India was out from "Oversubscribed" category. Before that India was used to be "Current" almost all the time. Now during the time India compeltely disapperared from bulletins, we needed to solely depend upon the internal news about retrogression and most of the information I was used to get from immigration.com and murthy.com articles and many articles were talking about this EB2 and Eb3 retrogression.
second trend of RIR denials and second trend of forcing EB3- NON RIR
filing. EB3 faced brief retrogression for 2 months. "
Bharat Premi please clarify
It is difficult for me to produce all "Proofs" at this point of time, perhaps if I dig my some of past CDs I may be able to bring some articles but it will be a hell of time. Anyway still trying to put some explanation. First of all you need to understand the difference between today's bulletin system and bulletin system prevalent around 1999-2003. I vaguely remember, mostly till 2002 mid only Mexico and Philipines and India were "oversubscribed" countries.INS played a very smart game with bulletins then as well but somehow there was no public cry like what we experienced during this july. I do not remember exactly but probably during almost whole 2003 and perhaps for some months during 2002 India was out from "Oversubscribed" category. Before that India was used to be "Current" almost all the time. Now during the time India compeltely disapperared from bulletins, we needed to solely depend upon the internal news about retrogression and most of the information I was used to get from immigration.com and murthy.com articles and many articles were talking about this EB2 and Eb3 retrogression.
tattoo Railway station clock at
gconmymind
01-03 05:12 PM
bump
more...
pictures central train station.
msyedy
02-02 08:59 AM
If you read closely, it appears like the 290,000 immigrant visas would be true for years from now on and for years 2001-2005 (the diffrence between current limit and this section). If that's the case and if that becomes a law, there is possibility there will be no backlog after that for some time...short time probably. Please correct me if I am wrongly reading this section. But for me, it appears it applies retroactively and will add the diffrence (150k a year) between years 2001-2005. If my calculation and understanding is correct, once this act becomes a law, the first year there would be 290k + 600k from years 2001-2005 ......I am not sure if my understanding is correct. I prey it is..
I don' think there is a point which says the visas from 2001-2005 will we
290K. From this fiscal year it will be 290K.
1) The total number of visa available that were not used last year
2) the total number of visa available that we not used from 2001-2005
From 2001-2006 the total was 140K
140 / 4 categories = 35000K for each(India-china-mexico-other). Now we do not know how many were unused from 2001-2006.
From what I understand, I do understand the country limits, and my guess is
There is no country limits, but only EB type limits.
If I am correct the dates of Each should move at least 2-2.5 years from now.
I believe people who need I-485 filling option without priority date should hope to get this too. STEM section has more support to be passed because it was never an issue in any of the houses.
This is my understanding-- I may be wrong
I don' think there is a point which says the visas from 2001-2005 will we
290K. From this fiscal year it will be 290K.
1) The total number of visa available that were not used last year
2) the total number of visa available that we not used from 2001-2005
From 2001-2006 the total was 140K
140 / 4 categories = 35000K for each(India-china-mexico-other). Now we do not know how many were unused from 2001-2006.
From what I understand, I do understand the country limits, and my guess is
There is no country limits, but only EB type limits.
If I am correct the dates of Each should move at least 2-2.5 years from now.
I believe people who need I-485 filling option without priority date should hope to get this too. STEM section has more support to be passed because it was never an issue in any of the houses.
This is my understanding-- I may be wrong
dresses Antwerp Central Station.
santb1975
04-15 12:33 AM
I will be at all three events as well
I have it in me, and I will be running all of the Team IV events to show my dedication and support for this cause.
I have it in me, and I will be running all of the Team IV events to show my dedication and support for this cause.
more...
makeup Antwerp Central Station
transpass
08-03 07:14 PM
Subkamnaa & Congrats friend. My PD is earlier than urs - Oct 05 . No LUD on mine. What is the July fiasco .
My PD is already current as of now. But there is no movement on my appl - but its just few days past its current status. I am on EB2 with PD of Oct 05 and Serv Center is NE where I got Labor and 140 approved.
Now I am no longer in that state because my project got over in NE. I am working in CA since 08 and filed 485 from CA .
Is there something that if I am in CA a different state from where I initially filed labor - it can cause RFE.
Quite honestly, I do not know the implications of filing 485 in CA when ur labor is from midwest. May be gurus in this forum might help you on this...
July fiasco is July 07 VB, where they made everything current and got swamped by the 485s. They initially withdrew the VB, but with pressure from all quarters including the prospect of lawsuits, they honored the initial VB so that everyone who could, was able to file 485..
My PD is already current as of now. But there is no movement on my appl - but its just few days past its current status. I am on EB2 with PD of Oct 05 and Serv Center is NE where I got Labor and 140 approved.
Now I am no longer in that state because my project got over in NE. I am working in CA since 08 and filed 485 from CA .
Is there something that if I am in CA a different state from where I initially filed labor - it can cause RFE.
Quite honestly, I do not know the implications of filing 485 in CA when ur labor is from midwest. May be gurus in this forum might help you on this...
July fiasco is July 07 VB, where they made everything current and got swamped by the 485s. They initially withdrew the VB, but with pressure from all quarters including the prospect of lawsuits, they honored the initial VB so that everyone who could, was able to file 485..
girlfriend Flash Mob invades Antwerp rail
ys2jax
07-11 08:25 PM
AILA talks about the letter:
http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=22870
"The Department's unprecedented decision to reject adjustment of status applications has caused needless hardship and disruption to countless immigrants," noted Rep. Zoe Lofgren. "It has also come to my attention that USCIS began returning visa numbers to the State Department as early as Thursday, July 5, 2007, due to their inability to review applications effectively. The Department of Homeland Security has once again demonstrated its inability to complete even its core missions. This debacle demonstrates the need for more transparency and oversight of the department's operations and procedures."
-------------------------
what does returning visa numbers mean? does that mean they still have visa numbers available, if that's the case they can't reject our applications :mad:
http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=22870
"The Department's unprecedented decision to reject adjustment of status applications has caused needless hardship and disruption to countless immigrants," noted Rep. Zoe Lofgren. "It has also come to my attention that USCIS began returning visa numbers to the State Department as early as Thursday, July 5, 2007, due to their inability to review applications effectively. The Department of Homeland Security has once again demonstrated its inability to complete even its core missions. This debacle demonstrates the need for more transparency and oversight of the department's operations and procedures."
-------------------------
what does returning visa numbers mean? does that mean they still have visa numbers available, if that's the case they can't reject our applications :mad:
hairstyles Antwerp#39;s Centraal station
CADude
05-16 11:45 AM
Similar from Senetor office but not this harsh. She noted details but requested me to contact CA senetors and my district rep. Anyway staff noted the details.
I called congressman Hinjosa's office.
The staffer asked me where I am calling from. Then said you are not a constituent of the congressman and was not willing to transfer to the person who handles immigration issues. I insisted on leaving a message and he took the message, but was surprised, did anybody else encounter this? How do we handle this if it happens with other congressmen?
I called congressman Hinjosa's office.
The staffer asked me where I am calling from. Then said you are not a constituent of the congressman and was not willing to transfer to the person who handles immigration issues. I insisted on leaving a message and he took the message, but was surprised, did anybody else encounter this? How do we handle this if it happens with other congressmen?
sdrblr
09-03 12:34 PM
Thank you. Well worry is part of life :)
congratulations! and you were so worried on 9/1/09 when you saw my post. :) I am glad you are cleared too!!
-Nola
congratulations! and you were so worried on 9/1/09 when you saw my post. :) I am glad you are cleared too!!
-Nola
gckp
05-01 03:08 PM
Center: Atlanta
PERM Filed: Oct 2007
PERM Audit Replied: Dec 2007
category : EB2
Field of work : IT
PERM Filed: Oct 2007
PERM Audit Replied: Dec 2007
category : EB2
Field of work : IT
Source URL: https://anacostiaque.blogspot.com/2011/07/antwerpen-centraal-railway-station.html
Visit anacostiaque for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection
No comments:
Post a Comment